The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the City and County of San Francisco in a case against the US Environmental Protection Agency involving the ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...
In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining liberal wing in dissent, the high court says EPA has the responsibility ...
20hOpinion
The Justices hand Trump a defeat, but deliver a win for San Francisco.
Supreme Court Sides With One of the Nation’s Most Liberal Cities in Challenge to EPA’s Authority
A majority of the Supreme Court sides with San Francisco over a permit the Environmental Protection Agency issued the city.
The Supreme Court sided with San Francisco on Tuesday in a case that could have long-term consequences for the Bay Area’s environmental protections and water quality. In a 5-4 decision authored by ...
Americans are getting antsy about the possibility of poop in the drinking water thanks to a new interpretation of the Clean Water Act. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that many are ...
Buyers of San Francisco's federal buildings in SOMA and Civic Center may see 60% discounts, and could be betting on a turnaround.
The Supreme Court’s ruling weakens the EPA’s ability to enforce water pollution standards, benefiting corporate interests at the expense of public health and environmental safety. With enforcement ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback